A real problem in management is that the employees and other stakeholders will look to leaders to make consistent decisions, keep a steady course, and aligned organisation's culture. But the problem is that leaders typically face multiple demands that conflict with one another, and it's a mistake to assume there are cut-and-dried choices.
As per nowadays, strategic paradoxes are essentially dilemmas that cannot be resolved. Tensions usuallyand continually arise between today's needs and tomorrow's (innovation paradoxes), between global and local integration and interests (globalisation paradoxes), and between social missions and financial pressures (obligation paradoxes).
How can we solve the difficult circumstances?
Managers need to shift from an "either/or" mindset to a "both/and" one by seeing the virtues of inconsistency, recognising that resources are not always finite, and embracing change rather than chasing stability. In practical terms, this means nurturing the unique aspects of competing constituencies and strategies while finding ways to unite them.
The theoretical suggestions seems reasonable, but I wonder which CEO in the world can perform as suggested?
Sadly, today's management is change oriented. change management is at the core of the whole thing.
Um... take care of yourself if you are at management level in an organisation.
Sleep tight, bye for now.
1 comment:
Agreed with your comment, who can perform...
Post a Comment